College of Veterinary Medicine / University of Mosul
  • Register
  • Login
  • العربیة

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 22, Issue 1
  3. Authors

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Facts and Figures

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Authorship

Document Download Center

Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery of intestinal anastomosis in dogs

    O. J. Ali B. T. Abass

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2008, Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 13-19
10.33899/ijvs.2008.5676

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate operative laparoscopy in comparison with conventional laparotomy for intestinal resection and anastomosis in dogs. Eighteen adult dogs were equally and randomly divided into 3 groups: Group I: Intestinal anastomosis was performed extracorporeally, by laparoscopic-assisted surgery, in which a 5cm loop of small bowel was exteriorized through a mini-laparotomy opening (an enlarged trocar incision 1.5-2 cm in length), then surgically resected and anastomosed by simple interrupted suture 3-0 polygalactine. Group II: Underwent laparoscopic intracorporeal intestinal resection and anastomosis, in which the loop of the small bowel was suspended into the ventral abdominal wall, then it was resected and anastomsed with simple continuous suture by polygalactine 3-0. Group III: Small bowel resection and anastomosis was conducted by conventional laparotomy technique with simple interrupted pattern by polygalactine 3-0 suture. The result showed that laparoscopic intestinal resection and anastomosis by either intra- or extracorporeal techniques can be applied in dogs safely and have less morbidity rate. Intra abdominal adhesion of the omentum and even the bowel to the abdominal wall occurred in group III but not in groups I and II. The post operative hospitalization time was earlier in group I and II, as indicated by the earlier return of intestinal motility and appetite, in comparison to group III where it was delayed.
Keywords:
  • PDF
  • XML
(2008). Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery of intestinal anastomosis in dogs. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 22(1), 13-19. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2008.5676
O. J. Ali; B. T. Abass. "Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery of intestinal anastomosis in dogs". Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 22, 1, 2008, 13-19. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2008.5676
(2008). 'Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery of intestinal anastomosis in dogs', Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 22(1), pp. 13-19. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2008.5676
Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery of intestinal anastomosis in dogs. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2008; 22(1): 13-19. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2008.5676
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 228
  • PDF Download: 88
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

© 2020, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul

 
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus