College of Veterinary Medicine / University of Mosul
  • Register
  • Login
  • العربیة

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 37, Issue 1
  3. Authors

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Facts and Figures

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Escherichia coli Isolated from veal meats and butchers’ shops in Mosul city, Iraq

    Shaker M. Othman Omar H. Sheet Raad Al-Sanjary

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2023, Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 225-260
10.33899/ijvs.2022.133819.2306

  • Show Article
  • Highlights
  • Full Text
  • References
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

 Foodborne pathogens bacteria can cause various diseases and death worldwide. Escherichia coli is the most crucial microorganism transmitted through meat and its products. Pathogenic E. coli is one of the major groups that can produce the Stx1 and Stx2 toxins. The present study aims to isolate and identify the E. coli bacteria using the classical methods, and to detect the specific-species uidA gene, and Stx1 and Stx2 genes using the PCR assay. Five hundred four samples were collected randomly from meats and different parts of a butcher shops from various regions of the right and the left sides of Mosul city. The results found that the prevalence rate of E. coli in this study was 27.4% (138/504). Additionally, the prevalence rate of E. coli was higher in meat, 41.7% (35/84). At the same time, the prevalence rate of E. coli was lower in hook 16.7% (14/84). Additionally, the prevalence rate of E. coli in meats and butcher shops on the right and left sides of Mosul city was 31.9% (65/204) and 24.3% (73/300), respectively. Furthermore, all E. coli isolates possessed the specific species uidA gene. 30/138 (21.7%) of E. coli isolates possess the Stx1 gene, while 17/138 (12.3%) of E. coli isolates have the Stx2 gene. Finally, most E. coli isolates possessed the Stx1 and Stx2 genes 91/138 (66%). 
Keywords:
    STEC Meat and butchers’ shops Stx1 and Stx2 genes PCR assay
Main Subjects:
  • Meat Hygiene

Introduction

 

Many Zoonotic foodborne microorganisms are transmitted from animals and their products to consumers while consuming the contaminated foods (1). The Zoonotic foodborne microorganisms have been able to contaminate meat while processing of carcasses in the abattoir (2). The most critical foodborne microorganisms isolated from meat and its products were Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter spp., which isolated from several cases of outbreaks of human illness (3-5). The most important source of proteins for human beings is meat which may be exposed to contamination by E. coli during the slaughter of the animals under unhygienic conditions and slaughter practices, pollutants, insects, and rodents (6,7). E. coli is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, facultatively anaerobic, which lives in the intestines of animals and humans (8). Humans may be infected with pathogenic Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) which causes various types of disease and sometimes death (9,10). STEC can cause outbreaks and food poisoning worldwide due to consuming contaminated food like meat (meat products) and milk (dairy products) (11,12), water, fruits, and vegetables (13). In addition, equipment such as knives, tables, saws, hooks, and other utensils may play a significant role in spreading the STEC during processing carcass and meats cuts (14). STEC can produce the Shiga toxins (15). The Shiga toxins (Stx1 and Stx2) are the primary virulence genes (16). Stx1 and Stx2 are responsible for causing diseases in consumers and animals (17). The methods used to identify the STEC are based on the classical methods including the selective media, chromogenic media, and biochemical tests, also on the Molecular biology techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and RT-PCR used to detect the target sequence gene (18). In the last decades, few studies have been performed to identify the STEC and its toxins isolated from meat. Therefore, the project was carried out to determine the prevalence of STEC in meats and butcher shops in Mosul city, Iraq.

 The study aimed to identify the phenotypic characterization of E. coli isolated from meats and butcher shops by using selective media, chromogenic media, and biochemical tests, as well as to identify the genotypic characterization of E. coli by detecting the uidA, Stx1, and Stx2 gene by using the PCR assay.

 

Materials and methods

 

Ethical approve

Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq, issue number 1418, 21.10.2021.

 

Sampling

In the current study, 504 samples were collected randomly from meats and different parts of a butcher’s shops (84 samples from each knife, hooks, tables, machines, worker's hands, and veal meat) of the right and the left part of Mosul city. The study period started in September 2021 and ended in January 2022. Meats were collected using sterile containers, while other collected samples were gathered using swabs which were put in containers (sterile) and then transported to the Researchers Center for diagnosis of zoonotic pathogenic bacteria.

 

E. coli isolation and identification

Meat samples and butcher shops parts swabs were analyzed to isolate and identify of pathogenic E. coli. All samples and swabs were inoculated in the nutrient broth (LAB, United Kingdom) and then incubated overnight at 37°C. For the classical culture method, one loop of nutrient broth was plated on the Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (EMB), and MacConkey agar (LAB, United Kingdom) and then incubated overnight at 37°C. In addition, Brilliance E. coli/coliform Agar (Oxoid, United Kingdom) was used in this study to differentiate between generic E. coli and coliform. The suspected E. coli isolates were confirmed using biochemical tests such as Gram stain, Indole test, Methyl Red test, Citrate Utilization test, and Voges-Proskauer test, Catalase, Oxidase, and Triple Sugar Iron agar (19). All the E. coli isolates were frosted in Nutrition broth (15% glycerol) at -80ºC until further use.

 

DNA isolation and template production

The suspected E. coli were cultured on the Brilliance E. coli/coliform agar overnight at 37°C. Deoxyribonucleic acid of E. coli was isolated according to the instructions of the DNeasy Blood and tissue kit (Geneaid, Korea). The concentration of Deoxyribonucleic acid of E. coli was estimated using the Bio-drop device then and stored at -20°C for further analysis.

 

UidA, Stx1, and Stx2 genes amplification

The PCR assay, amplified the sequence of the uidA, Stx1, and Stx2 of E. coli bacteria isolated (Table 1). Twenty-five μL (total volume of PCR reaction) (12.5 μL of 2×Go Taq Green Mix Master including (Promega Corporation, USA), 1 μL of primer-F, 1 μL primer-R, 6.5 μL of nuclease-free water (Promega Corporation, USA), and (v) 4 μL DNA template of E. coli. The whole mixture was put in the Eppendorf tube at 200 μL (Biozym, Oldenhorf, Germany). Finally, the amplicons of the target sequence were determined by using gel electrophoresis, DNA marker 100 bp (ladder), and 2% agarose gel (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany).

 

Table 1: PCR program and Primers for detection of uidA, Stx1, and Stx2 in E. coli

 

Gene

Primer

Sequence (5- 3)

Amplicon Size [bp]

PCR Program*

Reference

uidA

uidA-1

5-CCAAAAGCCAGACAGAGT-3

623

I

(20)

uidA-2

5-GCACAGCACZTCAAAGAG -3

Stx1

Stx1-1

5-AGTTAATGTGGTGGCGAAGG-3

347

II

(21)

Stx1-2

5-CACCAGACAATGTAACCGC-3

Stx2

Stx2

5- TTCGGTATCCTATTCCCGG-3

592

II

(21)

Stx2

5- CGTCATCGTATACACAGGAG-3

PCR program: I=35 times (94°C - 30s, 57°C - 30s, 72°C - 30s), II=35 times (94°C - 30s, 55°C - 30s, 72°C - 30s)

 

Results

 

According to the morphology of colonies, the positive E. coli isolates appeared color with a metallic green sheen on the EMB agar, dark pink color on the MacConkey agar, and purple color on the Brilliance E. coli / coliform Agar. In addition, all isolates of E. coli were positive for the special biochemical tests used for identifying the isolates of E. coli. Our findings showed that the prevalence of E. coli in meat and butcher shops was 27.4% (138/504). Furthermore, the percentage of E. coli was higher in meat, 41.7% (35/84). In contrast, the percentage of E. coli was lower in hooks in butcher shops, 16.7% (14/84). Additionally, the percentage of E. coli isolated from knives, tables, worker hands, and machines was 31% (26/84), 31% (26/84), 23.8% (20/84), and 20.2% (17/84), respectively (Table 2).

 

Table 2: Number and percentage of positive E. coli isolated from meats and butchers’ shops

 

Sample

No. of Sample

Positive No. (%)

Knives

84

26 (31)

Hooks

84

14 (16.7)

Tables

84

26 (31)

Machines

84

17 (20.2)

Hands

84

20 (23.8)

Meat

84

35 (41.7)

Total

504

138 (27.4)

 

In addition, our result showed that the percentage of E. coli isolated from meats and butchers’ shops on the right side of Mosul city was 31.9% (65/204) which is more than on the left side 24.3% (73/300). Furthermore, the prevalence rate of the E. coli isolated from knives, tables, machines, workers hands on the right side was 41.2%, 35.3%, 29.4%, and 29.4% that were higher contaminated from the knives, tables, machines, workers' hands on the left side of the Mosul city (Table 3).

 

Table 3: The percentage of positive E. coli isolated from meats and butchers’ shops on the right and left banks of Mosul city

 

Sample

Right side Left side

No. Sample

Positive No. (%)

No. Sample

Positive No. (%)

Knives

34

14 (41.2%)

50

12 (24%)

Hooks

34

5 (14.7%)

50

9 (18%)

Tables

34

12 (35.3%)

50

14 (28%)

Machines

34

10 (29.4%)

50

7 (14%)

Worker Hands

34

10 (29.4%)

50

10 (20%)

Meat

34

14 (41.2%)

50

21 (42%)

Total

204

65 (31.9%)

300

73 (24.3%)

 

 According to table 4, our findings showed that all E. coli isolates are possessed the specific species uidA gene. The results of the culture method were confirmed using the PCR technique. The results of the culture method and the results of the PCR assay were concorded (Figure 1). In addition, the Stx1 gene was detected in E. coli isolates 30/138 (21.7%) (Figure 2), while the Stx2 was detected in E. coli isolates 17/138 (12.3%) (Figure 3). Our study also revealed that most E. coli isolates possessed the Stx1 and Stx2 genes 91/138 (66%).

 

Table 4: The variation rate of the uidA, Stx1, and Stx2 genes in E. coli isolates

 

Gene

No. +ve E. coli

% +ve E. coli

uidA

138/138

100%

Stx1

30/138

21.7%

Stx2

17/138

12.3%

Stx1, Stx2

91/138

66%

 

 

 

Figure 1: UidA gene product in E. coli isolates (623 bp).

 

 

 

Figure 2: Stx1 gene product in E. coli isolates (347 bp).

 

 

 

Figure 3: Stx2 gene product in E. coli isolates (592 bp).

 

Discussion

 

In recent decades, E. coli has been considered the prime etiology of food poisoning worldwide. The food animal originated significantly transmitted E. coli to humans via the consuming contaminated foods with E. coli (22). our results demonstrate that the percentage of E. coli isolated from meat and butcher shops was 27.4% (138/504). In addition, this study showed the percentage of E. coli was rising in meat at 41.7% (35/84), which agreed with the previous surveys that found the percentage of E. coli in meat was 43.1% in India (23), 43.4 % in the United States (24). However, our results are lower than the previous surveys that appeared the percentage of E. coli from meat in Egypt was 54% (27/50) (25), 74.5% in South Africa (26), and 100% in Burkina Faso (27). In addition, our results were higher than other studies which found the prevalence rate of E. coli in meat was 1.5% in Iran (28), 17.8% in Australia (29), and 21.1% (49/232) in the United States (30). Various contamination rates of E. coli in meats may be due to variations in the national or geographic features of animal feeding systems, differences in meat processing, and differences in the methods used in the microbiological tests (31). Many studies found that raw and processed meat was more contaminated with E. coli (32). Meat and its products are exposed to contamination with E. coli from entering the animals to the slaughterhouse until consuming meat. Many factors contribute to transmitting E. coli to meat and its products such as the skin of animals, cutting tools and machines, an unhygienic environment, loss of workers' hygiene (33). In developing countries, most people want to buy cheap meats from the informal markets which do not apply hygiene instructions and safety standards when cutting meat (34).

Additionally, the current study showed that E. coli possesses the Stx1 gene in 30/138 (21.7%), while E. coli has the Stx2 gene in 17/138 (12.3%). Also, our study revealed that most E. coli isolates possessed the Stx1 and Stx2 genes in 91/138 (66%). The Stx1 gene is more predominantly detected than Stx2 in E. coli isolates. Our results were similar to previous contributions, which showed that the Stx1 was more frequently found in E. coli (35,36). Many studies showed a difference between the frequent found of the Stx1 and Stx2 genes in E. coli isolates. The previous study showed that 29% of isolates possess the Stx1 gene, 51% isolates carry the Stx2 gene, and 20% possess both Stx1 and Stx2 (37). The previous studies showed that 5.3% of isolates carried Stx1, 86% of isolates had Stx2, and 8.8% of isolates possessed Stx1 and Stx2 (38), another study declared that 40.68% of E. coli isolates contained Stx1 and 5.88% of E. coli isolated have Stx2 (36). At the same time the Stx1 and Stx2 genes did not detect E. coli isolated from meat and fish in Vietnam (39).

 

Conclusion

 

Escherichia coli is significant foodborne microorganismin humans due to consuming meats and meat products. Our findings revealed that E. coli was isolated from different samples (Knives, Hooks, Tables, Machines, and Worker Hands) which have a role in spreading the E. coli isolates in meats and meat products. The meat was the most contaminated with E. coli due to passing meat in different contamination stages starting from slaughterhouse until sale meats in the supermarket and meat shops. In addition, the molecular characteristics of E. coli isolates have appeared that some isolates possess only the Stx1 gene, while anther E. coli possess only the Stx2 gene, and most E. coli possess the Stx1 and Stx2 genes together.

 

Acknowledgments             

 

The authors express their gratitude for the efforts of the College of Veterinary Medicine, and the University of Mosul to provide them with all facilities.

 

Conflict of interest

 

There are no conflicts of interest.

  1. Isolation and identification of E. coli isolated from meat and butchers’ shops.
  2. Detection of the phenotypic and genotypic characterization of E. coli.
  3. Detection of the uidA, Stx1, and Stx2 genes in E. coli.
  4. Classical and molecular methods have been used to identify E. coli.
  • PDF (933 K)
  • XML
(2023). Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Escherichia coli Isolated from veal meats and butchers’ shops in Mosul city, Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 37(1), 225-260. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2022.133819.2306
Shaker M. Othman; Omar H. Sheet; Raad Al-Sanjary. "Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Escherichia coli Isolated from veal meats and butchers’ shops in Mosul city, Iraq". Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 37, 1, 2023, 225-260. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2022.133819.2306
(2023). 'Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Escherichia coli Isolated from veal meats and butchers’ shops in Mosul city, Iraq', Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 37(1), pp. 225-260. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2022.133819.2306
Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Escherichia coli Isolated from veal meats and butchers’ shops in Mosul city, Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2023; 37(1): 225-260. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2022.133819.2306
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver

  1. Neamah AA, Fahed KH, Sadeqand JN, Alfatlawi MA. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli isolated from milk of cattle affected by mastitis. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2022;36(1):251-254. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.129934.1702
  2. Awosile B, Eisnor J, Saab ME, Heider L, McClure JT. Occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in retail meat products from the Maritime Provinces, Canada. Can J Microbiol. 2021;67(7):537-47. DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2020-0442
  3. Kalin R, Öngör H. Examination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and some virulence genes in marketed minced meat samples. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014;20(6):957-60. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2014.11310   
  4. Karam MA, Maher SO, Hala MM, Al-Hyani OHH. Molecular detection of rfb O157, shiga toxins and hemolysin genes for Escherichia coli O157:H7 from canine feces in Tikrit and Mosul cities, Iraq. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(2):325-9. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2020.126831.1392
  5. Yousif MS, Tayeb BA. Estimation of limit of detection of Salmonella typhimurium in artificially contaminated chicken meat by cultured-based and polymerase chain reaction techniques. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2020;35(4):621-5. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2020.127328.1496
  6. Laury A, Echeverry A. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in meat. New York: Springer; 2009. 31-53 p.
  7. Amniattalab A, Ghalandarzadeh B. Prevalence and pathological evaluation of hepatic fatty change in cattle slaughtered at Urmia Abattoir, Northwest Iran. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2019;33(1):45-50. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.125518.1040
  8. Tenaillon O, Skurnik D, Picard B, Denamur E. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(3):207-17. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2298
  9. Karmali MA, Gannon V, Sargeant JM. Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC). Vet Microbiol. 2010;140(3-4):360-70. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780198570028.003.0008
  10. Dunya AM, Lafta IJ. RAPD-PCR and phylogenetic analysis of E. coli isolated from human and cattle urinary tract infections. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(Suppl I-III):59-66. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.131100.1918
  11. Putra AR, Effendi MH, Koesdarto S, Suwarno S, Tyasningsih W, Estoepangestie AT. Detection of the extended spectrum β-lactamase produced by Escherichia coli from dairy cows by using the Vitek-2 method in Tulungagung regency, Indonesia. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2019;34(1):203-7. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.125707.1134
  12. Sadeq JN, Fahed KH, Hassan HJ. Detection of Escherichia coli hlyA gene and Staphylococcus aureus sea gene in raw milk of buffaloes using RT-PCR technique in AL- Qadisiyah province. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2018;32(1):87-91. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2018.153815
  13. Cedric NB, Samir VS, Robert KS, Patricia MG, David P, Paul H. Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(9):2385-97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02297.x
  14. Herna´ndez M, Hansen F, Cook N, D Rg-Lz. Real-time PCR methods for detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens in meat and meat products. Safety Meat Processed Meat. 2009:427-46. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89026-5_16
  15. Gyles CL. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: An overview. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(13):45-62. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-508
  16. Paton AW, Paton JC. Direct detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by multiplex PCR for stx1, stx2, eae, ehxA, and saa. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(1):271-4. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.1.271-274.2002
  17. Schmidt H, Scheef J, Morabito S, Caprioli A, Wieler LH, Karch H. A new Shiga toxin 2 variant (Stx2f) from Escherichia coli isolated from pigeons. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(3):1205-8. DOI: 10.1128/aem.66.3.1205-1208.2000
  18. Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V, Gagnon M, Vaillancourt M, Bernier M. New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(5):1875-84. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1875-1884.2004
  19. Momtaz H, Dehkordi FS, Rahimi E, Asgarifar A. Detection of Escherichia coli, Salmonella species, and Vibrio cholerae in tap water and bottled drinking water in Isfahan, Iran. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:556. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-556
  20. Moyo SJ, Maselle SY, Matee MI, Langeland N, Mylvaganam H. Identification of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from infants and children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:92. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-92
  21. Fujioka M, Otomo Y, Ahsan CR. A novel single-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;92(3):289-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.12.010
  22. Busani L, Scavia G, Luzzi I, Caprioli A. Laboratory surveillance for prevention and control of foodborne zoonoses. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2006;42(4):401-4. [available at]
  23. Sethulekshmi C, Latha C, Anu CJ. Occurrence and quantification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from food matrices. Vet World. 2018;11(2):104-11. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.104-111
  24. Arthur TM, Barkocy-Gallagher GA, Rivera-Betancourt M, Koohmaraie M. Prevalence and characterization of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli on carcasses in commercial beef cattle processing plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(10):4847-52. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.10.4847-4852.2002
  25. Gwida M, Hotzel H, Geue L, Tomaso H. Occurrence of Enterobacteriaceae in raw meat and in human samples from Egyptian retail sellers. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014:565-671. DOI: 10.1155/2014/565671
  26. Vorster SM, Greebe RP, Nortje GL. Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in ground beef, broilers and processed meats in Pretoria, South Africa. J Food Prot. 1994;57(4):305-10. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-57.4.305
  27. Kagambega A, Haukka K, Siitonen A, Traore AS, Barro N. Prevalence of Salmonella enterica and the hygienic indicator Escherichia coli in raw meat at markets in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. J Food Prot. 2011;74(9):1547-51. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-124
  28. Siavash M, Mehdi Z, Mohammadpour H. Isolation and molecular characterization of non-sorbitol fermenting Escherichia coli isolated from fresh ground beef. J Hlth Sci. 2016;8(1):20-4. DOI: 10.17795/jjhs-31195
  29. Phillips D, Jordan D, Morris S, Jenson I, Sumner J. A national survey of the microbiological quality of retail raw meats in Australia. J Food Prot. 2008;71(6):1232-6. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.6.1232
  30. Tate H, Li C, Nyirabahizi E, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Rice-Trujillo C. A national antimicrobial resistance monitoring system survey of antimicrobial-resistant foodborne bacteria isolated from retail veal in the United States. J Food Prot. 2021;84(10):1749-59. DOI: 10.4315/JFP-21-005
  31. Rigobelo EC, Santo E, Marin JM. Beef carcass contamination by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains in an abattoir in Brazil: Characterization and resistance to antimicrobial drugs. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2008;5(6):811-7. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0138
  32. Hussein HS. Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(13 Suppl):E63-72. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-421
  33. Boukary AR, Thys E, Rigouts L, Matthys F, Berkvens D, Mahamadou I. Risk factors associated with bovine tuberculosis and molecular characterization of Mycobacterium bovis strains in urban settings in Niger. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012;59(6):490-502. DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01302.x
  34. James WO, Cheryl MEM, Makitabc K, Grace D. Investigation of the food value chain of ready-to-eat chicken and the associated risk for staphylococcal food poisoning in Tshwane Metropole, South Africa. Food Control. 2014;45:87-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.04.026
  35. Ranjbar R, Masoudimanesh M, Dehkordi FS, Jonaidi-Jafari N, Rahimi E. Shiga (Vero)-toxin producing Escherichia coli isolated from the hospital foods;virulence factors, o-serogroups and antimicrobial resistance properties. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:4. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-016-0163-y
  36. Nehoya KN, Hamatui N, Shilangale RP, Onywera H, Kennedy J, Mwapagha LM. Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in raw beef from informal and commercial abattoirs. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):0243828. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243828
  37. Mora A, Blanco M, Blanco JE, Dahbi G, Lopez C, Justel P. Serotypes, virulence genes and intimin types of Shiga toxin (verocytotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli isolates from minced beef in Lugo (Spain) from 1995 through 2003. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:13. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-13
  38. Llorente P, Barnech L, Irino K, Rumi MV, Bentancor A. Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from ground beef collected in different socioeconomic strata markets in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:795104. DOI: 10.1155/2014/795104
  39. Van TT, Chin J, Chapman T, Tran LT, Coloe PJ. Safety of raw meat and shellfish in Vietnam:an analysis of Escherichia coli isolations for antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;124(3):217-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.029

  • Article View: 87
  • PDF Download: 83
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

© 2023, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul

 
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus