College of Veterinary Medicine / University of Mosul
  • Register
  • Login
  • العربیة

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 36, Issue 1
  3. Authors

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Facts and Figures

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Nefopam and ketorolac: Isobolographic analysis of analgesic effect and pharmacokinetic profile in chicks

    Omar Y. Jassim Yaareb J. Mousa

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2022, Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 145-150
10.33899/ijvs.2021.129540.1660

  • Show Article
  • Highlights
  • Full Text
  • References
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

There are no prior studies on the pharmacological interaction between nefopam and ketorolac and on their pharmacokinetics in the chickens. The median analgesic effective doses (ED50s) of nefopam and ketorolac were estimated individually as 8.39 mg/kg, i.m. for each drug. Thereafter, their values were determined together in combination as 2.63 and 2.63 mg/kg, i.m. after administration at the ratio of 1:1 of their ED50s. The pharmacodynamic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac was designated as synergistic through the interaction index 0.62. Plasma concentrations of nefopam alone 16 mg/kg, i.m. in different measured times 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours were 34.07, 31.34, 22.53, 19.03, 14.81, and 10.37 µg/ml, whereas the plasma concentrations increased to become 44.67, 43.52, 45.71, 32.83, 20.96, and 22.54 µg/ml when administered with ketorolac 16 mg/kg, i.m. by 31, 39, 103, 73, 42, and 117 %, respectively. The changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of nefopam included increases in area under curve (AUC0-∞) 130%, area under moment curve (AUMC0-∞) 210%, mean residence time (MRT) 35%, half-life (t1/2β) 27%, time maximum (Tmax) 300% and concentration maximum (Cmax) 34%, whereas other values were reduced which included elimination rate constant (Kel) 21%, volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) 45% and clearance (Cl) 3%. The net results indicated a synergistic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac in addition to an alteration in nefopam pharmacokinetic parameters which may enhance nefopam therapeutic efficacy in chicks.
Keywords:
    chicks Ketorolac Nefopam Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics
Main Subjects:
  • Animal Pharmacology

Nefopam and ketorolac: Isobolographic analysis of analgesic effect and pharmacokinetic profile in chicks

 

O.Y. Jassim and Y.J. Mousa

 

Department of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

 

Corresponding Author: Assistant Professor Dr. Yaareb J. Mousa, yarub204@uomosul.edu.iq

 

O.Y. Jassim: 0000-0002-0881-686X

Y.J. Mousa: 0000-0002-0881-686X

 

 

Abstract

There are no prior studies on the pharmacological interaction between nefopam and ketorolac and on their pharmacokinetics in the chickens. The median analgesic effective doses (ED50s) of nefopam and ketorolac were estimated individually as 8.39 mg/kg, i.m. for each drug. Thereafter, their values were determined together in combination as 2.63 and 2.63 mg/kg, i.m. after administration at the ratio of 1:1 of their ED50s. The pharmacodynamic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac was designated as synergistic through the interaction index 0.62. Plasma concentrations of nefopam alone 16 mg/kg, i.m. in different measured times 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours were 34.07, 31.34, 22.53, 19.03, 14.81, and 10.37 µg/ml, whereas the plasma concentrations increased to become 44.67, 43.52, 45.71, 32.83, 20.96, and 22.54 µg/ml when administered with ketorolac 16 mg/kg, i.m. by 31, 39, 103, 73, 42, and 117 %, respectively. The changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of nefopam included increases in area under curve (AUC0-∞) 130%, area under moment curve (AUMC0-∞) 210%, mean residence time (MRT) 35%, half-life (t1/2β) 27%, time maximum (Tmax) 300% and concentration maximum (Cmax) 34%, whereas other values were reduced which included elimination rate constant (Kel) 21%, volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) 45% and clearance (Cl) 3%. The net results indicated a synergistic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac in addition to an alteration in nefopam pharmacokinetic parameters which may enhance nefopam therapeutic efficacy in chicks.

 

Keywords: Chicks, Ketorolac, Nefopam, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics

 

النیفوبام والکیتورولاک: تحلیل الایزوبولوکرافیک للتأثیر المسکن للألم وملف الحرکیة الدوائیة فی أفراخ الدجاج

 

عمر یونس جاسم و یعرب جعفر موسى

 

فرع الفسلجة والکیمیاء الحیاتیة والأدویة، کلیة الطب البیطری، جامعة الموصل، الموصل، العراق

 

الخلاصة

لا یوجد دراسات سابقة تناولت التداخل الدوائی بین النیفوبام والکیتورولاک فضلا عن ملفات الحرکیة الدوائیة لهما فی افراخ الجاج. أولا، تم إیجاد الجرعة الفعالة الوسطیة (الجف-50) التی تسکن الألم للنیفوبام والکیتورولاک کل على حدى وکانت 8,39 ملغم/کغم، فی العضل. بعد ذلک حددت الجف-50 للنیفوبام والکیتورولاک معا عند إعطائهما بنسبة 1:1 من قیمة الجف-50 لهما واصبحت هذه القیمة 2,63 ملغم/کغم، فی العضل لکل من الدوائین. کان نوعیة التداخل الدوائی بین النیفوبام والکیتورولاک هو تأزری من خلال تطبیق معادلة معیار التداخل 0,62. کان ترکیز النیفوبام فی بلازما الدم عند حقنه بجرعة 16 ملغم/کغم، فی العضل وخلال اوقات مختلفة 0,25، 0,5، 1، 2، 4 و 24 ساعة هو 34,07، 31,34، 22,53، 19,03، 14,81 و 10,37 میکروغرام/مل بینما زاد ترکیزه لیصبح 44,67، 43,52 ، 45,71 ، 32،83 ، 20،96 و 22,54 مایکروغرام/مل عند اعطاء الکیتورولاک معه بجرعة 16 ملغم/کغم ، فی العضل وبنسبة 31 ، 39 ، 103 ، 73 ، 42 و 117% على التوالی. زادت قیم الحرکیة الدوائیة للنیفوبام عند إعطاء الکیتورولاک معه وتضمنت المنطقة الواقعة تحت المنحنى130%، المنطقة الواقعة تحت منحنى اللحظة 210%، معدل وقت البقاء 35%، عمر النصف27%، الوقت الأعلى 300% والترکیز الأعلى 34% بینما انخفضت معاییر ثابت معدل الطرح21%، حجم التوزیع عند حالة الاستقرار45% والطرح 3%، تشیر مجموع نتائج هذه الدراسة إلى أن هناک تداخلا تآزریا بین النیفویام والکیتورولاک فضلا عن التغیر الحاصل فی قیم معاییر الحرکیة الدوائیة للنیفوبام والتی قد تساهم فی تحسین الکفاءة العلاجیة للنیفوبام فی أفراخ الدجاج.

 

Introduction

 

Nefopam belongs to non-narcotic analgesic drugs that cast-off for treatment of modest to severe pain sensation (1-4) and to manage a neuropathic pain disorder (5). Its analgesic action may be enhanced by acetaminophen coadministration (6). By its centrally acting on the brain and spinal cord, nefopam might produce a well, more weighty and consistent analgesia devoid of producing respiratory inhibition likewise to morphine (2,4,7-9) and oxycodone (10). Nefopam acts by an exclusive mode of action through producing analgesia by either change of sodium and calcium channels that reduce releasing of glutamate which considered a crucial neurotransmitter related to pain occurrence or it raises catecholamines (especially norepinephrine and dopamine) and serotonin action by decreasing their re-uptake to the presynaptic neurons, which are well-planned a pain signaling reliant neurotransmitters (4,11). Ketorolac activities are done by reversibly with non-selected cyclooxygenase (COX) reduction (i.e. reducing both isoforms which are COX1 and COX2), therefore, cut-off the process of prostaglandins biosynthesis and finally relieving the pain, fever, and inflammation (12-15). Ketorolac aids as peripheral analgesic medication that achieving modest and intense nociception with minimal untoward influences which account a well permitted, operative injectable remedy, inexpensive and economic analgesics medication dissimilar to the central opioids agonists like morphine and tramadol that have serious side effect corresponding to respiratory depression and medical addiction (16-20). Besides, ketorolac's action taking-place at non-narcotic receptors which lessens the threat of possibly enhancer untoward effects similar to hemo-dynamic modifications, centrally changes in nervous tissue, and respiratory suppression (19). Ketorolac's properties esteem appropriate medication working along with, cure and management of nociception induced after surgery because of, the pain and inflammation that produced by means of the operations and it provides both analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, in contrast to opioids, that do not provide anti-inflammatory action in this situation and having a slight therapeutic safety (21-23).

The current objective was to examine the effect of ketorolac on nefopam plasma concentration and its pharmacokinetic parameters as well as their analgesic interaction in chicks by the isobolographic analysis.

 

Materials and methods

 

Experimental chicks and drugs preparation

Seven to ten-day broiler chicks, of both genders, used in the trials, with a bodyweight of 90-130 g. They well-kept-up in 30-35○C, with nonstop light and the ground litter consequent from shreds of wood though water and food of chicks delivered freely. The dilution of nefopam (1%, Nefopam chlorhydrate, France) and ketorolac (3% Ketorolac trometamol, Spain) in a physiological saline solution (0.9% NaCl) to get the wanted dosage be injected intramuscularly (i.m.) by 5 ml/kg.

 

Animal ethics

The study and the usage of the experimental animals have been authenticated through monitoring by means of the scientific board of the department of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Mosul.

 

Determination of analgesic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac by using isobolographic analysis at a ratio of 1:1

The analgesic ED50s of either nefopam or ketorolac were assessed for each drug alone. Thereafter, the analgesic ED50 values of nefopam and ketorolac together (at 1:1 from their ED50 values) were measured by the up-and-down technique in the chicks (24). The first dosage of nefopam and ketorolac in isobolographic analysis were at 8.39 and 8.39 mg/kg, i.m. The chicks were measured individually prior, and post 15 minutes of treatment of the two drugs via using the electro-stimulator (Harvard apparatus, USA) (occurrence of distress call marked to pain sensation in the chicks) (25-32). At this time, the dosage of both drugs was reduced or raised by 25% (2.1 mg) of the first dose used of both drugs as to look or lack of the analgesic action.

 

Measuring the analgesic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac in the chicks

The ED50 values of nefopam (8.39 mg/kg, i.m.) and ketorolac (8.39 mg/kg, i.m.) administered alone be positioned on x and y axes, correspondingly. Direct line will have depicted to gain the isobolographic analysis among the ED50 dosages of nefopam and ketorolac each alone that produces analgesia in experimental chicks. The line indicates the line of additive effect (no interaction). The point below the line signifies a synergistic interaction whereas the point above the line indicates an antagonism pattern (33-35). The interaction index will have marked as Y symbol which could be figured out through the following: da/Da + db/Db which Da and Db were the analgesic ED50s of nefopam and ketorolac each alone; da and db were their coadministered analgesic ED50s, respectively (as shown in Table 1). Y= 1 indicates additive (there is no interaction), 1is antagonistic kinds of interaction (33-35).

 

Estimation of plasma concentration of nefopam alone and its modification with ketorolac coadministration in the chicks

One group was treated with nefopam alone at 16 mg/kg, i.m. while the other group was injected with nefopam (16 mg/kg, i.m.) and ketorolac (16 mg/kg, i.m.). Blood samples got from the jugular vein for 5 chicks per estimated time at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours for both the groups that received nefopam alone or nefopam plus ketorolac. Then, plasma was obtained by addition of heparin (B. Braun Medical Inc, USA) (used as 1:10 v/v) to the blood samples and undergoing centrifugation (Chalice, UK) at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. Lastly, plasma samples were frozen at -18 OC till analysis for 72 hours by the spectrophotometric device (Lovibond, Germany) with ultra violet detector (36,37).

 

Determination of nefopam plasma concentration and its alteration with ketorolac coadministration in the chicks

Preparing the phosphate buffer (pH=7.4)

The phosphate buffer solution was set by dissolving 6.82 g of KH2PO4 in 250 ml purified water in a graded flask to yield KH2PO4 (0.2 M). Another graded flask was used to set of NaOH (0.2 M) by dissolving 2 g of NaOH in 250 ml purified water. 195.5 ml of NaOH prepared before was added to 250 ml of KH2PO4 solution and then the volume of the solution will be completed to 1000 ml by addition of purified water. The pH of the resulted solution was attuned to 7.4 by the addition of either NaOH or HCl (36).

 

Preparing of nefopam standards

The nefopam standards are made of 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 µg/ml (36) by dilution of nefopam with the phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) previously described. The solution will undergo filtration through a filter paper. The net solution was finally analyzed by spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 330 nanometers (nm). Through the equation of the simple linear regression of the nefopam standards with R2= 0.9948, the concentration of nefopam in the plasma samples can be calculated in both groups of experimental chicks (included nefopam alone with or without ketorolac) (Figure 1). y= a + b x which y= absorbance of plasma samples (at 330 nm by spectrophotometer apparatus); a= intercept (0.001); b= slope (0.0076) and x= the nefopam concentration (unknown) in the plasma.

 

 

 

Figure 1: Nefopam's standards (25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 µg/ml) and the absorbance (330 nm) represented in a simple linear regression

 

Extraction of nefopam from the plasma samples

A simple, authorized, and precise method for extraction of nefopam was set to the plasma samples (37). The technique was demonstrated by the addition of 1 ml of phosphate buffer (pH= 7.4) to 1 ml of plasma sample then after, the mixture was moved to a glass tube experiencing vortexing for 5 minutes. After that, centrifugation was conducted (3500 rpm for 10 minutes) to obtain the resultant solution that filtered through a filter paper. The final solution was detected by the spectrophotometer device combined with a UV-chromatographic detection at 330 nm. The absorbance of different dilutions was measured in contrast to the blank of phosphate buffer mentioned before.

 

Determination of nefopam pharmacokinetic parameters and its alteration with ketorolac coadministration in the chicks

Non-compartmental model of pharmacokinetics was applied to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters for nefopam alone or its combination with ketorolac through a PKSolver program (38). These parameters comprised of AUC 0-∞ (µg × h / ml), AUMC 0-∞ (µg × h2 / ml), MRT (AUMC / AUC)(h), t1/2β (h), Tmax (h), Cmax (µg), Kel (0.693 / t1/2β) (h-1), Vss [dose × AUMC / (AUC)2](L / kg) and Cl (dose / AUC)(L / h / kg). The rise or reduction in the percentages obtained of these parameters was conducted in both groups that were treated with nefopam with or without ketorolac.

 

Statistics

The parametric statistical examination was directed by an unpaired student T-test applied to relate the means of the two groups (39,40). The level will be considered significant when p < 0.05.

 

Results

 

Analgesic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac by isobolographic analysis at a ratio of 1:1

The analgesic ED50 value of nefopam alone was 8.39 mg/kg, i.m. and for ketorolac alone was 8.39 mg/kg, i.m. The resulted analgesic ED50 values of nefopam and ketorolac combinations were 2.63 and 2.63 mg/kg, i.m. when given together 1:1 from their ED50s. Table 1 displays the various results gained from this experiment.

 

Analgesic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac in the chicks

The interaction index (Y) is 0.62 (less than 1) so that, the pharmacodynamic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac is synergistic as expressed in Table 1 and Figure 2.

 

Table 1: Analgesic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac by using isobolographic analysis at a ratio of 1:1

 

Parameters

Nefopam alone

Ketorolac alone

ED50 value*

8.39 mg/kg, i.m.

8.39 mg/kg, i.m.

Initial dosage

9 mg/kg

9 mg/kg

Last dosage (xf)

9 mg/kg

9 mg/kg

Table value (k) (24)

- 0.305

- 0.305

± Dosage (d)

2 mg

2 mg

Range of the dosages

7-11 mg/kg

7-11 mg/kg

Overall chicks

5 (XOOXX)

5 (OXXOX)

 

Nefopam+ketorolac

 

ED50 value*

2.63 mg/kg, i.m.

2.63 mg/kg, i.m.

Initial dosage

8.39 mg/kg

8.39 mg/kg

Last dosage (xf)

4.19 mg/kg

4.19 mg/kg

± Dosage (d)

2.1 mg

2.1 mg

Table value (k) (24)

- 0.741

 

Range of the dosages

2.09-8.39 mg/kg

 

Overall chicks

7 (XXXOXOX)

 

#Y= da/Da + db/Db

0.62

 

* ED50 value= xf + (k × d)

X= result (analgesia), O= no result (no analgesia)

Volts registered preinjection and after 15 minutes of nefopam and ketorolac injection

# Da and Db resembles ED50 results for nefopam versus ketorolac alone while da and db resembles their coadministered ED50 results, respectively. An interaction index of 1 indicates additive, 1 antagonism interactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: Isobolographic examination of analgesic interaction among nefopam and ketorolac. The point on x-axis denotes the ED50 value of nefopam (8.39 mg/kg, i.m.) while the point on y-axis represents the ED50s of ketorolac (8.39 mg/kg, i.m.). The triangular point represents 1:1 of ED50s combinations for both drugs (2.63 and 2.63 mg/kg, i.m. for nefopam and ketorolac). The position of the triangular point indicates synergistic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac.

 

Plasma concentration of nefopam (µg/ml) alone or its combination with ketorolac in the chicks at different times

There is a significant rise in the nefopam plasma concentration when coadministered with ketorolac in contrast to the group injected with nefopam alone. The plasma concentration of nefopam alone (16 mg/kg, i.m.) estimated through different times (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours) were 34.07, 31.34, 22.53, 19.03, 14.81 and 10.37 µg/ml whereas the plasma concentration of nefopam and ketorolac (16 and 16 mg/kg, i.m. respectively) was elevated to became 44.67, 43.52, 45.71, 32.83, 20.96 and 22.54 µg/ml by 31, 39, 103, 73, 42 and 117 %, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 3).

 

Table 2: Plasma concentration (µg/ml) of nefopam with or without ketorolac in the chicks through different measured times

 

Time (Hour)

Groups

Effect of ketorolac on plasma concentration of nefopam (%)+

Nefopam alone

Nefopam plus ketorolac

0.25

34.07 ± 1.38

44.67 ± 1.69*

31

0.5

31.34 ± 1.50

43.52 ± 0.94*

39

1

22.53 ± 1.10

45.71 ± 1.86*

103

2

19.03 ± 0.48

32.83 ± 0.81*

73

4

14.81 ± 1.31

20.96 ± 1.74*

42

24

10.37 ± 0.45

22.54 ± 0.61*

117

Numbers characterized as mean ± SE (5 chicks/ time estimated)

* Significantly dissimilar from the nefopam alone group (p < 0.05)

Nefopam was injected at 16 mg/kg, i.m. alone or with ketorolac at 16 mg/kg, i.m.

+ % of the effect of ketorolac on plasma concentration of nefopam= nefopam plus ketorolac - nefopam alone / nefopam alone × 100

 

 

 

Figure 3: Plasma concentration of nefopam with or without ketorolac in the chicks through different estimated times (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 Hour)

 

Pharmacokinetic profile of nefopam with or without ketorolac in the chicks

Administration of nefopam alone elucidate the pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC 0-∞ (771.13 µg × h / ml), AUMC 0-∞ (32322.19 µg × h2 / ml), MRT (41.92 h), t1/2β (29.33 h), Tmax (0.25 h), Cmax (34.07 µg), Kel (0.024 h-1), Vss (0.88 L / kg) and Cl (0.021 L / h / kg). The values of AUC 0-∞, AUMC 0-∞, MRT, t1/2β, Tmax and Cmax in the chicks that administered nefopam plus ketorolac were elevated to became 1773.96, 100075.33, 56.41, 37.17, 1, and 45.71 by 130, 210, 35, 27, 300, and 34 %, respectively whereas other pharmacokinetic parameters included Kel, Vss and Cl were reduced to became 0.019, 0.48, and 0.009 by 21, 45, and 3 % respectively in contrast to the group treated with nefopam alone (Table 3).

 

Table 3: Pharmacokinetic parameters of nefopam with or without ketorolac in the chicks

 

Pharmacokinetic parameters

Units

Treated groups

Effect of ketorolac (%)*

Nefopam alone

Nefopam plus ketorolac

AUC0-∞

µg×h/ml

771.13

1773.96

(+) 130

AUMC0-∞

µg×h2/ml

32322.19

100075.33

(+) 210

MRT = AUMC / AUC

h

41.92

56.41

(+) 35

t1/2β

h

29.33

37.17

(+) 27

Tmax

h

0.25

1

(+) 300

Cmax

µg

34.07

45.71

(+) 34

Kel = 0.693/ t1/2β

h-1

0.024

0.019

(-) 21

Vss=dose×AUMC/(AUC)2

L / kg

0.88

0.48

(-) 45

Cl = dose / AUC

L / h / kg

0.021

0.009

(-) 3

Nefopam was injected at 16 mg/kg, i.m. with or without ketorolac at 16 mg/kg, i.m.

Pharmacokinetic parameters gained are non-compartmental model measured using PKSolver program

* % of the effect of ketorolac on plasma concentration of nefopam= nefopam plus ketorolac - nefopam alone/nefopam alone×100

 

Discussion

 

The objective was to examine the effect of ketorolac on nefopam plasma concentration and its pharmacokinetic parameters besides their possible pharmacodynamics interaction (analgesic interaction) in the chicks as illustrated by isobolographic analysis.Nefopam is considered a good, profound, and non-narcotic analgesic medication used primarily to treat moderate and severe of acute or chronic nociception (3,4), and its analgesic activity may be potentiated by certain drugs like acetaminophen (5). By its centrally acting on the brain and spinal cord, nefopam could produce a better, more profound, and reliable analgesia without causing respiratory depression like morphine (4,7,9). As found in this study, the values of ED50s for nefopam and ketorolac combination were decreased in comparison for their values alone suggesting an increase in the analgesic efficacy which is required to produce analgesia in half of the population used as the experimental model. The isobolographic analysis considered a good tool for determining the type of pharmacological interaction between two drugs (33-35) and as indicated here, there is a synergistic interaction between nefopam and tramadol through estimating their interaction index. This is thought to be attributed to the different mechanisms of action of centrally nefopam (4,11) and peripheral ketorolac (14,15). The other important key for increase effectiveness and synergistic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac was estimated here in this study which is the alteration in the different pharmacokinetic parameters of nefopam when coadministered with ketorolac. The change in the pharmacokinetic profile of nefopam resulted from an increase in the plasma concentration (free drug) of nefopam affected by administering ketorolac and this may be attributed to competition on the protein binding and the number of binding sites on plasma proteins (albumins) (direct effect of the apparent volume of distribution) because ketorolac is considered a highly protein-bound drug (> 99%) as found in other relevant studies (41) which causes an elevation of nefopam free drugs available at the sites of action besides the direct effect of ketorolac on the other crucial factors determining the pharmacokinetics included absorption, metabolism, and excretion. Other studies show that ketorolac increased the effectiveness of the other administered drugs like local and general anesthetics for induction of balanced anesthesia (23,28).

 

Conclusion

 

The net results of this study indicated a synergistic interaction between nefopam and ketorolac as well as an alteration in nefopam pharmacokinetic parameters which may enhance nefopam therapeutic efficacy in chicks.

 

Acknowledgments

 

We would like to acknowledge the University of Mosul, College of Veterinary Medicine, for the facilities delivered.

 

Conflict of interest

 

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Article Highlights

  1. The efficacy of nefopam was enhanced with ketorolac coadministration.
  2. Nefopam and ketorolac interact synergistically.
  3. Ketorolac increased the plasma concentration of nefopam.
  4. Ketorolac alter the pharmacokinetic profile of nefopam.
  • PDF (704 K)
  • XML
(2022). Nefopam and ketorolac: Isobolographic analysis of analgesic effect and pharmacokinetic profile in chicks. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 36(1), 145-150. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.129540.1660
Omar Y. Jassim; Yaareb J. Mousa. "Nefopam and ketorolac: Isobolographic analysis of analgesic effect and pharmacokinetic profile in chicks". Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 36, 1, 2022, 145-150. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.129540.1660
(2022). 'Nefopam and ketorolac: Isobolographic analysis of analgesic effect and pharmacokinetic profile in chicks', Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 36(1), pp. 145-150. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.129540.1660
Nefopam and ketorolac: Isobolographic analysis of analgesic effect and pharmacokinetic profile in chicks. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2022; 36(1): 145-150. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.129540.1660
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver

  1. Phillips G, Vickers MD. Nefopam in postoperative pain. Brit J Anaesth. 1979;51(10):961-965. DOI: 10.1093/bja/51.10.961  
  2. Heel RC, Brogden RN, Pakes GE, Speight TM, Avery GS. Nefopam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1980;19(4):249-267. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198019040-00001
  3. Alfonsi P, Adam F, Passard A, Guignard B, Sessler DI, Chauvin M. Nefopam, a nonsedative benzoxazocine analgesic, selectively reduces the shivering threshold in unanesthetized subjects. Anesthesiol. 2004;100(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200401000-00010
  4. Girard P, Chauvin M, Verleye M. Nefopam analgesia and its role in multimodal analgesia: A review of preclinical and clinical studies. Clin Experim Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;43(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.12506
  5. Kim KH, Abdi S. Rediscovery of nefopam for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Kor J Pain. 2014;27(2):103-111. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.2.103
  6. Li Q, Zhuang Q, Gu Y, Dai C, Gao X, Wang X, Wen H, Li X, Zhang Y. Enhanced analgesic effects of nefopam in combination with acetaminophen in rodents. Biomed Rep. 2018;8:176-183. DOI: 10.3892/br.2017.1032
  7. Zanjani TM, Saghaei E, Ameli H, Sabetkasaei M. Anti-allodynic effect of nefopam and morphine in rat model of neuropatheic pain. Nov Biomed, 2013;1:16-22. DOI: 10.22037/nbm.v1i1.4488  
  8. Kapfer B, Alfonsi P, Guignard B, Sessler DI, Chauvin M. Nefopam and ketamine comparably enhance postoperative analgesia. Anesthes Analg. 2005;100(1):169-174. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000138037.19757.ED
  9. Kang P, Park SK, Yoo S, Hur M, Kim WH, Kim JT, Bahk JH. Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions to prevent shivering after surgery: a network meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(1):60-70. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12813-6
  10. Tigerstedt I, Tammisto T, Leander P. Comparison of the analgesic dose-effect relationships of nefopam and oxycodone in postoperative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1979;23(6):555-560. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1979.tb01486.x
  11. Sanga M, Banach J, Ledvina A, Modi NB, Mittur A. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of nefopam, a dual reuptake inhibitor in healthy male volunteers. Xenobiotica. 2016;46(11):1001-1016. DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2015.1136989
  12. Botting RM. Inhibitors of cyclooxygenases: Mechanisms, Selectivity and Uses. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006;57(5):113-124. [available here]  
  13. Finkel R, Clark MA, Cubeddu LX, Harvey RA, Champe PC. Lippincott's illustrated reviews: Pharmacology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2009. 500-518 p. [available here]
  14. Smyth EM, FitzGerald GA. Basic and clinical pharmacology. 11th ed. New York: McGrew-Hill Co Inc; 2009. 313- 329 p. [available here]   
  15. Hilal-Dandan R, Brunton LL. Goodman and Gilman's Manual of Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2014. chapter 34. [available here] 
  16. Jelinek GA. Ketorolac versus morphine for severe pain. Brit Med J. 2000;321(7271):1236-1237. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1236  
  17. Ollé FG, Opisso JL, Oferil RF, Sánchez PM, Calatayud MR, Cabré RI. Ketorolac versus tramadol: comparative study of analgesic efficacy in the postoperative pain in abdominal hysterectomy. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2000;47(4):162-167. [available here]   
  18. Rainer TH, Jacobs P, Ng YC, Cheung NK, Tam M, Lam PKW, Wong R, Cocks RA. Cost effectiveness analysis of intravenous ketorolac and morphine for treating pain after limb injury: Double blind randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J. 2000;321(7271):1247-1251. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1247  
  19. Shankariah M, Mishra M, Kamath RA. Tramadol Versus Ketorolac in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain Following Maxillofacial Surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11(3):264-270. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-011-0321-y  
  20. Hendarman I, Triratna S, Kamaludin MT. Ketorolac vs. tramadol for pain management after abdominal surgery in children. Paed. Indon. 2014;54(2):118-121. DOI: 10.14238/pi54.2.2014.118-21
  21. O'Hanlon JJ, Beers H, Huss BKD, Milligan KR. A comparison of the effect of intramuscular diclofenac, ketorolac or piroxicam on post-operative pain following laparoscopy. Europ J Anaesthesiol. 1996;13(4):404-407. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1996.d01-365.x
  22. Macario A, Lipman AG. Ketorolac in the era of cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A systematic review of efficacy, side effects, and regulatory issue. Pain Med. 2001;2(4):336-351. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2001.01043.x
  23. Gupta A, Cheng J, Wang S, Barr GA. Analgesic efficacy of ketorolac and morphine in neonatal rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;68: 635-640. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00475-5
  24. Dixon WJ. Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1980;20:441-462. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pa.20.040180.002301  
  25. Mousa YJ. Analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of ketorolac in the chicks. Ind J Anim Sci. 2019; 89:1086-1090. [available here]
  26. Mousa YJ. Etomidate analgesia in chicks: Effect of xylazine. J Hell Vet Med Soc. 2020; 71(4), 2463-2470. DOI: 10.12681/jhvms.25921
  27. Mousa YJ, Al-Zubaidy MHI. Anesthetic efficacy of ketamine, ketamine-tramadol and ketamine-ketorolac in chicks. Iran J Vet Res. 2019;20:33-38. DOI: 10.22099/ijvr.2018.29755.4496  
  28. Mousa YJ, Mohammad FK. The analgesic efficacy of xylazine and dipyrone in hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in chicks. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2012;26: 69-76. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2012.67444
  29. Naser AS, Amin YM. Analgesic effect of silymarin in chicks. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2019;33(2): 273-276. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.162906
  30. Shaban KhA, Ibrahim MH, Faris GA. Evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of xylazine and it’s interaction with metoclopramide in the acute pain model in mice. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2020;34(2):383-388. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.126070.1226
  31. Al-abdaly YZ, Al-Hamdany EK, Al-Kennany ER. Toxic effects of butylated hydroxytoluene in rats. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(1):121-128. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2020.126435.1322
  32. Al-abdaly YZ, Saeed MG, Al-Hashemi HM. Effect of methotrexate and aspirin interaction and its relationship to oxidative stress in rats. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(1):151-156. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2020.126490.1335
  33. Gonzalez C, Zegpi C, Noriega V, Prieto JC, Miranda HF. Synergism between dexketoprofen and meloxicam in an orofacial formalin test was not modified by opioid antagonists. Pharmacol Rep. 2011;63(2):433-440. DOI: 10.1016/s1734-1140(11)70509-6   
  34. Valle M, Garrido MJ, Pavon JM, Calvo R, Troconiz IF. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of main active metabolites of tramadol, (+) O-desmethyltramadol and (-) O-desmethyltramadol, in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;293:646-653. [available here]
  35. Tallarida RJ. Statistical analysis of drug combinations for synergism. Pain. 1992;49(1),93-97. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90193-F  
  36. Sharma N, Arora S, Madan J. UV-Visible Spectrophotometry Method Validation for Analysis of Nefopam HCl in Poly-3-Hydroxybutyrate and Poly-ε-Caprolactone Microspheres. Inter J ChemTech Res. 2017;10(6):74-280. [available here]  
  37. Singh S, Sharma N, Singla YP, Arora S. Development and validation of UV-Spectrophotometric method for quantitative estimation of nefopam hydrochloride in polymethacrylate nanospheres. Inter J Pharmacy Pharmaceut Sci. 2016;8(1): 414-419. [available here] 
  38. Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, Xie S. PKSolver: An add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Comput Meth Prog Biomed. 2010;99:306314. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.007
  39. Katz MH. Multivariable analysis: A practical guide for clinicians and public health researchers. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 14-74 p. [available here]
  40. Petrie A, Watson P. Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2013. 1-408 p. [available here] 
  41. Reed MD, Myers CM, Blumer JF. Influence of midazolam on the protein binding of ketorolac. Curr Therap Res. 2001;62(8):558-565. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-393X(01)80061-8

  • Article View: 662
  • PDF Download: 349
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

© 2023, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul

 
Powered by eJournalPlus